A recent dealing with a buyer we met got me thinking about how buyers typically approach negotiations when looking for property. Most are tempted to eagerly point out the property’s apparent – and often obvious – faults. Buyers often ‘talk down’ the home’s benefits and focus on its shortcomings in an apparent precursor to justify an initial low offer.
Pointing out a property’s faults or highlighting what renovations need to be made to the agent achieves little other than to alert the agent of a genuine interest to buy because it is such a common buyer trait.
Similarly, buyers armed with computer-generated ‘valuations’ attempt to challenge a property’s asking price predicated on their fallible market opinion determined by an algorithm.
This is all perfectly normal of course but, importantly, such a buying strategy can be disadvantageous because it risks offending the seller. The agent is obliged to directly convey any negative feed-back to their client (such as their decor choices) and sellers like to sell to people they like, not those who pour scorn over their much-loved home.
Our buyer wrote a lengthy letter to our seller, going into great detail as to why they ought to accept their below-market offer. The seller was most displeased and rejected their offer and went so far as to proclaim, “We’re not selling to them!” Ultimately, another buyer came along and paid fair market price with the original buyer bemoaning why they weren’t given a further opportunity to negotiate.
Taking a defensive position about the price or presentation of a property gives you no advantage as a buyer at all, irrespective of the market conditions.
It is only at the point of negotiating the sale that a buyer should reveal their price and conditions. A positive, constructive, outcomes-focused approach with the agent gives the buyer a far greater chance at securing the property from a seller sympathetic to australian casino bonuses someone who loves it but can’t really afford it compared to a buyer who is able to afford it but is stuck on a price because of an inaccurate computer-generated valuation.
Buying and selling real estate is rarely just about the sale price. Sellers have a genuine and emotional attachment to their properties and are often so dismayed at the level of criticism of their property from a potential buyer they will stubbornly refuse to deal reasonably on an offer where otherwise it may well have been acceptable.
During the winter months, when market conditions can flatten out, vendors often choose to hold off on their selling plans until spring when both gardens and moods improve. In a balanced market, this can be a reasonable strategy; an attractive garden can add genuine value to a property and there … Read more
Property market analysis can be confusing with the major data houses and property commentators using a variety of price assessment methodologies in their published analysis. For example, according to Core Logic, Perth’s median dwelling value is $813,810 as at 31st May. Ray White group’s Chief Economist reckons Perth’s ‘geometric mean … Read more